Authority details
Evidence intake
The audit starts from screenshots you choose to upload. It reads the card as a stranger would: what appears first, what creates confidence, and what creates doubt.
- -Lead photo and first-frame clarity.
- -Gallery order and repeated visual story.
- -Prompt and bio specificity.
- -Visible contradictions between copy, context, and photos.
Inference discipline
The audit distinguishes observation from inference. A finding should point back to visible evidence before it becomes a correction.
Correction priority
The report is not a list of every possible improvement. It ranks fixes by likely first-impression impact: lead frame first, sequence next, then bio and prompt clarity, trust leaks, and optional downstream work.
How the signal is kept in bounds
The AI perception step returns a small structured set of visible attributes. The product validates that structure, abstains when evidence is unclear, and selects customer-facing copy from versioned mappings. The model does not write an unconstrained verdict.
- -Visible evidence only.
- -Low-confidence results abstain.
- -Each signal maps to an observation and action.
- -Provider, prompt, and cost status are recorded.
Limits
The methodology does not access private dating app ranking systems, predict individual outcomes, or replace judgment. It improves the clarity of the profile evidence under your control.
Start at the profile audit overview, then continue to private intake when you are ready to stage screenshots.